Explanation
To solve this, we must interpret the logical relationship between the two events using Set Theory and Probability axioms.
1. Understanding the relationship:
"The occurrence of A implies the occurrence of B" means that whenever event A happens, event B must also happen. In terms of sets, this implies that A is a subset of B:
A⊆B
"Not vice-versa" means that B can occur without A occurring. Therefore, A is a proper subset of B (A⊂B).
2. Relating to Probability:
For any two events where A⊆B, the probability of A must be less than or equal to the probability of B:
P(A)≤P(B)
Since the problem explicitly states that the implication does not work "vice-versa," it implies there is a non-zero probability that B occurs while A does not. Thus, the probability of B must be strictly greater than the probability of A:
P(A) < P(B)