To find which statement is incorrect, we evaluate the trigonometric relationships in a triangle.
1. Verification of Option (d)
This is the standard Law of Sines, which relates the side lengths to the sines of their opposite angles:
sinAa=sinBb=sinCc
This formula is fundamentally correct for all triangles.
2. Verification of Option (c)
Using the Law of Sines where a=ksinA and b=ksinB (where k is the diameter of the circumcircle), we substitute into the expression:
a+ba−b=ksinA+ksinBksinA−ksinB=sinA+sinBsinA−sinB
This identity is correct.
3. Verification of Option (a)
Applying the sum-to-product trigonometric formulas to the result of option (c):
sinA+sinBsinA−sinB=2sin(2A+B)cos(2A−B)2cos(2A+B)sin(2A−B)
By simplifying, we get:
a+ba−b=cot(2A+B)tan(2A−B)
This is the standard Napier's Analogy (Law of Tangents), which is correct.
4. Verification of Option (b)
We know that in △ABC, A+B+C=π, therefore 2A+B=2π−2C.
Using the co-function identity:
cot(2A+B)=cot(2π−2C)=tan(2C)
Substituting this into the correct formula from option (a):
a+ba−b=tan(2C)tan(2A−B)
Comparing this to option (b), which gives a+ba−b=tan(2C)tan(2A−B), we see that the denominator in the option is tan(2C) instead of 1/tan(2C) or cot(2C).
Therefore, Option (b) is the incorrect statement.