NIMCET 2007 — Reasoning PYQ
NIMCET | Reasoning | 2007Directions for : The following questions contains a series of numbers of which one is incorrect. Select the incorrect one:
63. 3, 51, 51055, 255255
Choose the correct answer:
- A.
51
- B.
55
- C.
51055
(Correct Answer) - D.
255255
51055
Explanation
1. Analyzing the Given Sequence
The given numerical sequence is:
3,51,51055,255255
In this type of reasoning puzzle, the numbers grow at a highly rapid rate, which strongly indicates a geometric progression or a multiplication-based sequence involving prime numbers or consecutive odd numbers. Let us find the underlying rule connecting the terms.
2. Identifying the Step-by-Step Pattern
First Term to Second Term (3→51):
To see what multiplier transforms 3 into 51, we divide:
351=17
This gives us the first operational rule:
3×17=51
Second Term to Third Term (51→Expected Term):
The number 17 is a well-known prime number. Let us test if the sequence progresses by multiplying consecutive prime numbers in ascending order.
The consecutive prime numbers starting from 17 are:
17,19,23,29,…
Let's multiply the second term (51) by the next prime number, which is 19:
Expected Third Term=51×19=969
However, 969 does not match the given third number (51055), nor does it match the option choices well. Let us look at another sequence of multipliers.
Alternative Pattern: Product of Consecutive Odd Prime Numbers
Notice the digits of the third and fourth numbers closely. They resemble products of fundamental prime numbers:
Let's try multiplying prime numbers directly to check if they form composite combinations:
3×17=51
The prime factors of 51 are 3 and 17.
Let's look at the product of consecutive odd prime numbers: 3×5×7×11×13×17×…
Let's compute the product of consecutive odd prime numbers up to 17:
3×5×7=105
105×11=1155
1155×13=15015
15015×17=255255
Notice that 255255 is exactly the fourth term in our sequence!
Therefore, the sequence terms are built by progressively expanding the product of consecutive odd prime numbers:
1st Term: Given as the initial base prime number:
Term 1=3
2nd Term: Product of the first few odd primes up to 17 (skipping intermediate blocks) or a combined step:
Term 2=3×17=51
4th Term: The product of all consecutive odd primes from 3 to 17:
Term 4=3×5×7×11×13×17=255255
3. Spotting the Incorrect Term
Let's see how the 3rd term should fit into this sequence chain perfectly.
If the fourth term is 255255, let's divide it backward by the last prime factor (17) to find what the correct preceding third term should be:
Correct Third Term=17255255=15015
Let us verify if 15015 makes structural sense with the second term (51):
5115015=295⟹5×59 (not a single consecutive prime cluster)
Let's look at the option choices provided: (a) 51, (b) 55, (c) 51055, (d) 255255.
Notice that option (b) lists 55, but the number printed in the original series is 51055.
This reveals a typographical pattern inside the wrong term itself! The number 51055 was written incorrectly in place of the mathematical combination. Let's inspect the division of the given incorrect term:
5255255=51051
If the sequence was generated using standard factor sub-blocks:
3
3×17=51
Correct Third Term=51×1001=51051(Since 7×11×13=1001)
51051×5=255255
Thus, the precise correct sequence value must be 51051. The question provides 51055 instead, making it the mathematically flawed, incorrect term of the series.
Final Answer
The incorrect term in the series is 51055.
Therefore, the correct option is (c).

