MAH-CET 2026 — Mathematics PYQ
MAH-CET | Mathematics | 2026If is the number of solutions of the equation , (0 < x < 2\pi), then value of is

If n is the number of solutions of the equation ∣cotx∣=cotx+sinx1, (0 < x < 2\pi), then value of n is
1
(Correct Answer)2
3
4
1
To find the total number of valid solutions n within the given interval 0 < x < 2\pi, we must analyze the absolute value term ∣cotx∣ by splitting it into two distinct algebraic cases based on the quadrants.
Note that x=π because cotx and sinx1 are undefined at x=π.
The cotangent function is positive or zero in the first quadrant (0 < x \leq \frac{\pi}{2}) and the third quadrant (\pi < x \leq \frac{3\pi}{2}).
In this domain, ∣cotx∣=cotx. Substituting this back into the original equation:
cotx=cotx+sinx1
Subtracting cotx from both sides gives:
0=sinx1
This implies:
1=0
Since this statement is completely impossible, Case 1 yields no solutions.
The cotangent function is strictly negative in the second quadrant (\frac{\pi}{2} < x < \pi) and the fourth quadrant (\frac{3\pi}{2} < x < 2\pi).
In this domain, ∣cotx∣=−cotx. Substituting this back into the original equation:
−cotx=cotx+sinx1
Rearrange the equation by moving cotx to one side:
−2cotx=sinx1
Now, rewrite cotx in terms of sine and cosine:
−2(sinxcosx)=sinx1
Since sinx=0 anywhere in our defined open sub-intervals, we can safely multiply both sides by sinx:
−2cosx=1
cosx=−21
The cosine function is negative in the second quadrant and the third quadrant. Let us check the specific principal solutions within our overarching boundary (0 < x < 2\pi):
In the Second Quadrant (\frac{\pi}{2} < x < \pi):
x=π−3π=32π
Constraint check: In the second quadrant, cot(32π) is negative, which perfectly satisfies the condition for Case 2. Thus, x=32π is a valid solution.
In the Third Quadrant (\pi < x < \frac{3\pi}{2}):
x=π+3π=34π
Constraint check: In the third quadrant, cot(34π) is positive. However, Case 2 explicitly requires \cot x < 0. Therefore, x=34π is rejected.
There is only 1 single unique value (x=32π) that satisfies the original relationship. Therefore, the total number of solutions is n=1.
Hence, the correct option is (a) 1.
To find the total number of valid solutions n within the given interval 0 < x < 2\pi, we must analyze the absolute value term ∣cotx∣ by splitting it into two distinct algebraic cases based on the quadrants.
Note that x=π because cotx and sinx1 are undefined at x=π.
The cotangent function is positive or zero in the first quadrant (0 < x \leq \frac{\pi}{2}) and the third quadrant (\pi < x \leq \frac{3\pi}{2}).
In this domain, ∣cotx∣=cotx. Substituting this back into the original equation:
cotx=cotx+sinx1
Subtracting cotx from both sides gives:
0=sinx1
This implies:
1=0
Since this statement is completely impossible, Case 1 yields no solutions.
The cotangent function is strictly negative in the second quadrant (\frac{\pi}{2} < x < \pi) and the fourth quadrant (\frac{3\pi}{2} < x < 2\pi).
In this domain, ∣cotx∣=−cotx. Substituting this back into the original equation:
−cotx=cotx+sinx1
Rearrange the equation by moving cotx to one side:
−2cotx=sinx1
Now, rewrite cotx in terms of sine and cosine:
−2(sinxcosx)=sinx1
Since sinx=0 anywhere in our defined open sub-intervals, we can safely multiply both sides by sinx:
−2cosx=1
cosx=−21
The cosine function is negative in the second quadrant and the third quadrant. Let us check the specific principal solutions within our overarching boundary (0 < x < 2\pi):
In the Second Quadrant (\frac{\pi}{2} < x < \pi):
x=π−3π=32π
Constraint check: In the second quadrant, cot(32π) is negative, which perfectly satisfies the condition for Case 2. Thus, x=32π is a valid solution.
In the Third Quadrant (\pi < x < \frac{3\pi}{2}):
x=π+3π=34π
Constraint check: In the third quadrant, cot(34π) is positive. However, Case 2 explicitly requires \cot x < 0. Therefore, x=34π is rejected.
There is only 1 single unique value (x=32π) that satisfies the original relationship. Therefore, the total number of solutions is n=1.
Hence, the correct option is (a) 1.