CUET PG 2026 Reasoning PYQ — Statements: I. All windows are door. II. No door is a wall. Concl… | Mathem Solvex | Mathem Solvex
Tip:A–D to answerE for explanationV for videoS to reveal answer
CUET PG 2026 — Reasoning PYQ
CUET PG | Reasoning | 2026
Statements:
I. All windows are door.
II. No door is a wall.
Conclusions:
I. No window is wall.
II. No wall is door.
Choose the correct answer:
A.
neither I nor II
B.
only I
C.
only II
D.
Both I and II
(Correct Answer)
Correct Answer:
Both I and II
Explanation
Solution
To solve this, we can use a Venn diagram approach:
Statement I ("All windows are door"): This means the circle for "Windows" (W) is entirely inside the circle for "Doors" (D).
W⊂D
Statement II ("No door is a wall"): This means the circle for "Doors" (D) and the circle for "Walls" (L) have no intersection. They are completely separate.
D∩L=∅
Evaluating Conclusions:
Conclusion I ("No window is wall"): Since all windows are inside the "Door" circle, and the "Door" circle cannot touch the "Wall" circle, it is physically impossible for any "Window" to be a "Wall."
Conclusion I is Correct.
Conclusion II ("No wall is door"): Statement II says "No door is a wall." In logic, "No A is B" always implies "No B is A." Therefore, if no door is a wall, then no wall can be a door.
Conclusion II is Correct.
Final Answer:
Since both conclusions follow logically from the statements, the correct option is (d) Both I and II.
Explanation
Solution
To solve this, we can use a Venn diagram approach:
Statement I ("All windows are door"): This means the circle for "Windows" (W) is entirely inside the circle for "Doors" (D).
W⊂D
Statement II ("No door is a wall"): This means the circle for "Doors" (D) and the circle for "Walls" (L) have no intersection. They are completely separate.
D∩L=∅
Evaluating Conclusions:
Conclusion I ("No window is wall"): Since all windows are inside the "Door" circle, and the "Door" circle cannot touch the "Wall" circle, it is physically impossible for any "Window" to be a "Wall."
Conclusion I is Correct.
Conclusion II ("No wall is door"): Statement II says "No door is a wall." In logic, "No A is B" always implies "No B is A." Therefore, if no door is a wall, then no wall can be a door.
Conclusion II is Correct.
Final Answer:
Since both conclusions follow logically from the statements, the correct option is (d) Both I and II.